DISQUS

The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs: The Dalai Lama is bugging the shit out of me lately, begging me to help him.

  • Archie_Medes · 1 year ago
    Too bad Tibet does not have any petroleum reserves and that we are beholden to Communist China for our economy.
  • faddah · 1 year ago
    heidi roizen??? she still drunk-dial-booty-call's you? sheezus. i thought you'd be taking calls from a bit higher class, like your old fall-back joan baez, or princess yasmin aga khan, or at the very least demi moore, when that kutcher brat just gets on her nerves.

    but anyway, yeah. all we buddhists know — dalai lama? great when he's doing the lecture circuit or bestowing empowerments or making time to visit asshat dilettantes like richard geer and even dubya, but the moment he wants something, best to be otherwise engaged pretty durn quick.

    the funny thing is — the world recognizes him as both the spiritual and political leader of the exiled tibetans, and those in exile from tibet will nod to that so they get some focus, as he is good at keeping the cause in the spotlight and grabbing the photo ops, but in truth, it's only the gulapa sect of the vajryana tibetan buddhists who promote this. and that's because they promoted the first big dalai lama (third leader in the galupa sect) as both a spiritual and political leader as it turned out to be a bit of an advantageous power grab back in the 16th century, because he was already influencing/teaching a mongolian prince, altan khan (which is where, some might say, a lot of the trouble started — china claims authority as the prince they were beholden to for protection was mongolian, and, therefore, one of them, tibet says, no, he became protector of tibet for tibetans, and the disagreement just goes on for over half an eon from there, along with other complications). the other sects of tibetan vajryana, like the nyigmas, the sakyas, the what-have-ya's ... well, it's hard to say what they feel about him. but for now, they let him be both the show boat and also take the first arrows.

    i will say — he's a good guy. bit of a lovable cherub at times. loves the compassion thing. likes talking about quantum physical from a pop-spirituality point of view, etc. can be good at parties. stands by non-violence, no matter what. can't argue with that. it's his thing, what he does best. but yeah, he must get neurotic about all this late at night. sorry 'bout the calls, man. but imagine what the rest of us buddhists have to put up with the other 365 days of the year.
  • FakeNoamChomsky · 1 year ago
    No need to condemn Steve, you fellows. The entire sad debacle of Tibet can be laid at the feet of dysfunctional world politics, from China's fascist repression to the US's shameless dealing with dictators and strongmen (not least the Chinese). In a world where no one is truly free, Tibet's tragedy is to make that painfully visible. Rather than criticize Steve, you need to assert your innate human rights and demand accountability from your corrupt government. No one will be free until we all demand freedom with our voices, our bodies, and our lives.
  • Love is all · 1 year ago
    How much do you know politics? Do you have any idea who has killed 600 thousand Iraq civilian? ( http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB11605289... )

    Where is the native Indian in American?

    Please learn more about history. You are too simple, sometimes naive.
  • FakeNoamChomsky · 1 year ago
    My friend, I've often been accused of being naive, but never simple. I do know a thing or two of history and politics; they've been an avocation of mine for a little while now.

    Of course I'm keenly aware of the misdemeanors perpetrated by the US on behalf of its cynical and corrupt government, and I've protested them loudly for decades. I'm friggin Noam Chomsky, have you heard of me? Apparently not.
  • Love is all · 1 year ago
    Dear Mr. Chomsky,
    You are a prestigious scholar and that’s exactly why we are shocked by your comments in this thread. Personally I respect you very much since I was born in a culture which respects the teachers and the elders. But academically, I have two concerns about your opinions.

    1. How to define FASCIST?
    How could you easily accuse a country as FASCIST recklessly? It is good to think or hypothesize boldly, but it is definitely more important to reason, to prove it with substantial evidence.

    China’s ascension to a global superpower is no longer a forecast. In less than twenty years, China has experienced the same degree of industrialization and social transformation as Europe did in two hundred years. I admit that China’s fragility is also directly related to its extraordinary rise, and, that is the reason why we are studying in US. But at least, we are growing smoothly and steadily in the right track after two hundred years of war, invasion, holocaust, disease, death... People are living happily and peacefully now. If you ever experienced, or if you had the sanity to imagine the painful history, you would appreciate and cherish this economic boom and peaceful home.

    My sense is that you should have a better chance to understand how to define fascism since you are Jewish and you know better about your own people’s history. No government, or broadly, nothing is perfect. But most Chinese citizen would not understand your arrogant comments to define China as FACIST. Culturally, you are not morally above anyone, not a single one. To be hones, I doubt if you ever know anything about the current China. By the way, this FACIST country once saved thousands of Jewish during WWII, most of them have returned to Israel and some of them are the elites of this country now.

    2. Anarcy
    Anarchy? Without the מְדִינַת יִשְרָאֵל, it would be highly possible that what had happened to Jewish during WWII would happen again, even though you could control the economy and media in US.

    I appreciate very much for your kind attention in this topic. I would like to discuss with you further about IT later on if it would be possible to you. I believe that the more we share, the more we have.
  • FakeNoamChomsky · 1 year ago
    Dear Love is all,

    First, I'm sorry; I wrote in haste. I should not have said China is "fascist" as that's technically incorrect. I should have said "repressive," "tyrannical," and "implacably hostile to the human spirit." I think we can agree those terms are much less offensive than "fascist" so please accept my apologies.

    Second, I do not share your antipathy to "anarchy" or rather, your implied preference for the centralized State. Your implication that lack of governance would lead to genocide neglects the plain fact that most (but admittedly not all) of the genocides of the last hundred years were meticulously planned and executed by sovereign states.

    Two last things: first, my heritage and religious beliefs are not germane to this discussion. And second, it's unnecessary to write "Midnat Yisra'el" in Hebrew if you're not going to call China "Zhongguo" or "中國" ("中国"). Let's not show off.
  • Love is all · 1 year ago
    Dear Dr. Chomsky, thank you so much for your kind reply!
    You are the Father of generative grammar and modern linguistics and I appreciate your amazing academic achievements. It is definitely feasible for you to chop and break down the word FASCIST into letters A, S, I, T, S, F, C, mix them and then rearrange them into another FASCIST as you defined as "repressive," "tyrannical," and "implacably hostile to the human spirit." Essentially, it is kind of a game.

    I defend your right to free speech, but I can not agree with your description of China in this way although I hold the position that “I have sworn . . . eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man” (Thomas Jefferson).

    But please keep two things in mind:
    First of all, the current Political Ecosystem in China is not “Tyrannical”. Basically, there are two main forces, reformism (liberalism) and conservatism. Even within each force, not a single person has the absolute power to dictate the fate of this country. So, your conclusion is way from correct, (except that you break down the word TYRANNICAL into letters again, mix them and craft another new TYRANNICAL.)

    Secondly, the western value system is never universal, not to mention permanent. It may be the best way to realize the maximal interest for the western. Each country has its own unique background. We have existed in this planet for more than 5000 years. We need to learn from other countries and peoples, but we definitely know how to choose the best way for ourselves. (SKIP 10 thousand words…)

    2. ANACHY
    I agree with you that many of the genocides of the last hundred years were meticulously planned and executed by sovereign states. But I do not think it is because the SOVEREIGH STATE itself, rather, it is the human nature and/or some other environment factors that caused them. Or in other words, without SOVEREIGH STATE, you might even expect more cruel genocides than we already had. Or logically, SOVEREIGH STATE is neither sufficient nor necessary to genocides, though it did play an important role in the whole tragedy. So I highly doubt your idea that eradicating SOVERGIGH STATE would automatically stop genocides. If things could be so simple, thanks GOD!!!

    Further more, I can show you how the reasoning underpinning your conclusion is flawed. If we look back to a little bit more extended period, say during the 3000 years of China history: most major wars or holocausts happened between two dynasty replacements, or exactly in the state of ANACHY.

    Dear Mr. Chomsky, I am sorry I have to pause here to dissect the mice to obtain the neurons and figure out how the animals think. I am sorry for my ungentlemanly debate behavior. But I will try to complete my first point as soon as I finish my experiment.
    I am always confused, the neurons and the glia cells can co-exist in the brain so elegantly, harmoniously, and beautifully, why cannot humans, I mean as perfectly as neuron-glials? That’s really beyond me.
  • Frank Wang · 1 year ago
    Dear Dr. Chomsky,

    It is interesting to see you here. I was a student
    of linguistics and had great respect for your
    academic as well as political writings. But, I am
    very disappointed to see such a sharp mind
    as stereotyped and blind to reality as anyone
    else on the street in a Western country.

    I really do not understand the "moral high
    grounds" (in the words of our Speaker of the
    House) Westerners believe they have over
    other parts of the world. Reducing the
    economic, religious, geographic, developmental,
    ethnic, cultural...differences in the world to just
    "democracy" vs "dictatorship", or "human rights"
    vs "repression" is simple and naive, and mis-
    leading/self-deceptive. I see this brainwashing
    happening right before my eyes. My son, who is
    studying in a US middle school, understands
    modern history as "Road to Democracy". How
    about industralization, how about de-conolization,
    how about, like what the Chinese are doing,
    revitalization of ancient cultures? These are no
    less important than democracy, which, if we
    trace back, was the rule of game invented by the
    Greeks for decision making and power sharing.
    Why should all the peoples in all the world follow
    this rule of the game by the Greeks? Why can't
    another culture believe in the country being run
    like a family, where the head of the country is
    empowered by what he is, not how he is put in
    that position? Of course, in your terminology,
    that becomes "totalitarian" and "dictatorship".
    But many countries, even Western countries,
    have been governed this way for thousands of
    years, and in the long history of the human race,
    such countries, including China, have contri-
    buted no less to the human civilization than the
    Greeks. Should their achievement be ignored
    or dismissed because it did not resulted from
    a democratic system, which emphasizes the
    rights of the individual over order, harmony and
    good for the whole community? So we just
    pay lip service to "diversity"?

    I am particularly offended by your use of "China"
    in your posts. The biased, brainwashing
    Western media has been careful enough to use
    "Communist Chinese government" in their
    one-sided criticism. You did not even bother to
    touch it up, placing yourself in direct opposition
    to all the Chinese. I don't necessarily identify
    with the Chinese government, but I am a
    Chinese. That's why I cannot stand by.

    This abnormal interest in Western countries in
    Tibet is really strange and entertaining. Many
    who defend the "freedom of Tibet" cannot even
    tell where Tibet is on the map, not to mention
    its history or current situation. If you want to
    hear some voices different from the mainstream
    Western media, here are the observations from
    a Westerner in China:
    http://discussions.pbs.org/viewtopic.pbs?t=6807...
  • krokkel · 1 year ago
    ... well this one is bellow the belt - sorry not funny!
  • ME, Not U · 1 year ago
    People in Tibet being brutally murdered by the Chinese, no not at all funny. But the thought of the Lama going to ask Steve Jobs for help at PR? Not that is funny. Sorry Krokkel, you need to start reading between the lines.
  • ME, Not U · 1 year ago
    Ack. That was supposed read "NOW that is funny". Sorry
  • krokkel · 1 year ago
    hey - you changed it after I commented. All because of me? ;-)
  • notlikely · 1 year ago
    this isn't funny. sad to see what was once a great blog go stale and pathetic, needing to take cheap shots to drive traffic.

    fuck you mr lyons.
  • fakestevejobs · 1 year ago
    Right back atcha, frigtard.
  • Thomas Ross (aka AppleTom) · 1 year ago
    Steve this frig's IP is [whoa -Ed] are you gunna get Moshe on this, 'cause Johnnie Travolta's warmin' up the jettie...

    .....whoo-WAH!!! skuzza, SKUZZA!!! sp's, man, S - friggin' - P's

    MAN!!!!
  • Love is all · 1 year ago
    Mr. Jobes,
    Would it be possible for us to delete some of our own replies in the thread?
    Thanks,
    Paul
  • Bill Gates · 1 year ago
    Bite my shorts, dude.
    Geez, what a moron.

    I'M the only one who can talk to him like that.
  • Mike Cane · 1 year ago
    Here I am, having escaped (temporarily?) from Level 5 Biocontainment, and you've been productive.

    Do you know how they're marketing enemas in NYC now? IS2G: Colon Hydrotherapy!!!
  • Mike Cane · 1 year ago
    As the fever eats my brain, before I die I get to see The Secret Of Life on the Internet: Babby

    I don't recommend it unless you have a high fever.

    Shhhh! The Croissants are doing their strip tease.
  • JohnMuir · 1 year ago
    So that's what Heidi was on about with "Blowing You Off at Eight." Thanks for making sense of that.

    http://valleywag.com/tech/bad-ideas/heidi-roize...
  • Carl Spackler · 1 year ago
    So I jump ship in Hong Kong and make my way over to Tibet...and I get on as a looper at a course in the Himalayas.

    A looper?

    A looper. You know, a caddy, a looper...a jock.

    So I tell them I'm a pro jock and who do you think they give me?

    The Dalai Lama, himself. The 10th son of the Lama. With flowing robes, grace, bald, striking...

    I'm on the first tee with him. I give him the driver He hauls off and whacks one. Big hitter, the Lama...long...into a 10 thousand foot crevace right at the base of this glacier!

    Do you know what the Lama says?

    "Gunga galunga. Gunga gunga da gunga."

    So we finish the round and he's going to stiff me. And I say, "Hey, Lama! How about a little something, you know, for the effort?"

    And he says, "There won't be any money...but when you die, on your deathbed...you will receive total consciousness."

    So I've got that going for me...which is nice.
  • Larry Ellison · 1 year ago
    Now wait a minnit. Jobso, you know I NEVER call the switchboard. Every CEO in the Valley has a PL. And some of us have a Double-Secret-Probation PL. AKA a "Private Line." Has D-Man heard of it?

    Call me. I wanna hear some of those voicemails. Those little robe-dudes are an inscrutable lot, aren't they?

    L
  • Thomas Ross (aka AppleTom) · 1 year ago
    Steve this frig's IP is [whoa -Ed] are you gunna get Moshe on this, 'cause Johnnie Travolta's warmin' up the jettie...

    .....whoo-WAH!!! skuzza, SKUZZA!!! sp's, man, S - friggin' - P's

    MAN!!!!
  • Thomas Ross (aka AppleTom) · 1 year ago
    ^ disregard friggin' disqusting computer comment sp's
  • Shawn · 1 year ago
    i'll add more of the same... this isn't funny at all and you're grabbing at anything to post on this site anymore. you should have given it up a a while back. this is pitiful and disgusting.

    what's next? the iraq death toll is up to 4000, maybe you should make fun of the soldiers who have been sent their to their death by this stupid country. or maybe post some pictures of dying children and poke fun at them? this site used to be hilarious; give it up before it keeps going downhill.

    if you want a political blog to express your own opinions, create one, don't post the sh*t here.
  • Shimsham · 1 year ago
    4000? 655,000 more like. Or do civilians not count if they are not from the U.S.
  • Love is all · 1 year ago
    Mr. Jobes,
    Would it be possible for us to edit some of our own replies in the thread?
    Thanks
  • Russel Huge · 1 year ago
    Now I am sure that Dalai is actually a political figure, instead of purely a person in religion.
  • Jaguar · 1 year ago
    Hmmm, I'm fucking surprised that Dalai had called you so many times. A senior Lama like Dalai has a number of wisdom consorts, who must be virgins at ages of 8, 12, 16 or 20. Dalai must be quite busy fucking around. I'm fucking telling the truth, they even swallow the mixture of the red and white.

    And, Dalai Lama's shit and pee are worth a lot of money. Those stuff are collected in golden containers, then are mixed into some drugs, and sold at skyhigh prices.

    Shit! Yep, shit. BUt it's fucking true. I didn't read it on April 1, or May 32.
  • H Teng · 1 year ago
    I can not comment on Dalai Lama as I have not met him, but please do not attack the Lamaism practices as they are parts of the a true religion that may not necessarily fit into the norms of mundane society. Yes the highest forms of Lamaism involve instruments made from human skins, skulls, and other body parts, involve prolonged sexual intercourses with women of various ages, involve eating and drinking disgusting stuff by the standard of an average person. But those can not be seen as evil as long as they lead to the true enlightenment of the one practices them.
  • Love is all · 1 year ago
    Would you mind to be part of the true religion such providing your parts while you are alive? Please help them lead to the true enlightenment!
  • Jones · 1 year ago
    My problem is what kind person Dalai Lama really is. You can hardly find anything good about Tibet or him before 1950, the history reality. Main stream media usually skips or are very brief on this matter. He may appear to be a "nice" person now, talking about freedom and human rights but numerous articles proved otherwise historically. Yes, human can change, but would you let your young daughter under a convicted sex offender because you believe he has changed?
  • Ansem · 1 year ago
    wow, that isn't nice at all... even if he does bother you, that's no reason to hate his guts...
  • Watzen nanpo · 1 year ago
    We're all equal, sometimes different, but equal in our true nature
  • acap. · 1 year ago
    It seams that the CIA's planarround 51 to destabilize china with tibetian spirit was partial failed.